Monday, August 6, 2012

Behind the RH Bill

Good Evening Everyone!

A little boy curiously asked his Grandfather one day,” Lolo, Is a wind still a wind if it doesn’t blow?” His bespectacled Lolo paused for a few minutes and said,” Well, apo it’s simply called air.”

Just like the little boy we have lot of questions crossing our mind. We need somebody knowledgeable enough to satisfy our quest for answers. More so if it will affect our personal being and the community where we dwell.

Our legislative halls have been flooded with various support and criticisms from the different sectors of the society, specifically on the RH Bill issue, which recently has a total of six versions pending before the committee. The Health Committee has the primary jurisdiction of the old bill and the Population Committee for the present bill and secondary referrals. With its latest version, House Bill No.96 – The Reproductive Health and Population and Development Act of 2010. The bills described as health bills, continues to stir the public.

True to our belief, the coin has two sides; the bill do has two faces. Proponents and supporters believe that the RH bill is pro-poor, pro-women and pro-life. They believe that its right based since the parents are given the opportunity to exercise freely and responsibly plan the number and spacing of their children through the use of modern natural and artificial family planning method , which are legal, medically-safe and truly effective which all, are embodied in the bill. They believe it is a health measure since it will improve maternal health and reduce infant mortality. Women are given opportunities to be productive freeing themselves from untimely pregnancies and abortion incidences. In the long run, it will reduce poverty and sustainable human development will be achieved, as a result of reduced population.

But the church teaches us that Life is sacred. A life in womb should be taken as a blessing because it’s God’s mystery of love.  It has a right to our protection and guidance. And we are morally responsible for them. In a position paper made by the Council of the Laity of the Philippines, they manifested their vehement objection on the bill primarily because reproductive heath and services tacitly approves the services of abortion as define by the United Nations. It has made legal the official funding for the population control measures and devices by classifying contraceptives as essential medicines, making it appear that human fertility is a disease that must be treated. They do believe that mandatory education of Grade 5 students on sexuality and family planning recommended in the bill unnecessarily exposes children at a very tender age, at the same time, violates the constitutional rights of parents to educate their children in accordance with their moral and religious beliefs. .

As citizens of this country, how would this proposed bill affect us, as a nation. Our parents taught us to be morally upright from childhood. Does it still work within us or has it been gradually eroded with the changes of time. Will the bill help us to be better off? Or   will it just be another vehicle to the same web of poverty. As far as our cultural practice is concerned, would it preserve our tradition as Filipinos or the other way around? Above all, how would this affect our already vulnerable physical well-being?

The state recognizes the sanctity of family life and protects the life of the mother and the life of the unborn from conception as provided by our constitution. The church, on the other hand, expresses his voice when issues are contrary to its teachings. The state and the church are inseparable.

And I quote the former Senate Majority Leader Francisco S. Tatad saying, “The oft-misquoted separation of the church and state does not separate the State from God. That’s why in the first line of the Preamble of our Constitution, we implore” the aid of Almighty God.” And the President’s oath to”preserve and defend the Constitution, execute laws, do justice to every man and consecrate myself to the service of the Nation,” ends with, “So help me God.”

(Delivered during the Efcom culmination program)